A serious issue

Re Baptism of Jesus, January
Like Genevieve Whyte, I am astounded and shocked. Rev. Laurence DeWolfe tells us quite dogmatically that the first Christology was adoptionist. What about Paul (writing prior to the Gospels) in Philippians 2 and 2 Corinthians 8? DeWolfe informs us that the Gospels are hopelessly full of contradictions and that “Different New Testament communities had different ideas about where Jesus came from and what that meant.” Many students of the Bible, however, will feel that the differences should not be exaggerated and that there is a marvelous unity in the New Testament portrait of our Lord.
DeWolfe wants us to “look beyond” the Church's confession and see that there was a time when Jesus “began to be God's Son.” This sounds like adoptionism to me and I wonder how anyone who holds such a view can remain a minister of a church in which he is required to sign a statement that he is in essential agreement with the Westminster Confession of Faith.
Many have been exercised of late about the drift toward the acceptance of homosexuality in the church, but this issue is far more serious. This is the core of our faith – was Jesus a man who became the Son of God and somehow reveals who God is, or was he always the Son, born of the Virgin Mary, our crucified Saviour and exalted Lord? The church has always affirmed the latter. Is it now acceptable in the Presbyterian Church in Canada to maintain the former?