I was interested in the different reviews (December) of C.S. Lewis's Mere Christianity and agree with most of them. However, I disagree with Harris Athanasiadis' description of Lewis as a leftist rationalist. Politically, in addition to his socially conservative views on women and homosexuality, which were conventional for the time, Lewis was highly critical of the post-war socialist government of Clement Atlee. This becomes clear from reading his collected letters, which for anyone willing to plough through the 2,000 pages that have been published so far (up to the year 1949) make fascinating and rewarding reading. However, it is with the notion that Lewis approached Christianity primarily from a rationalist perspective that I would take issue. As one of the most distinguished literary critics of his day he was certainly an academic, and in today's climate of anti-intellectualism this may be enough to diminish his stature among contemporary post-modernists. No question he belonged to the earlier modernist tradition, which, beginning with the 18th-century Enlightenment, acknowledged human reason as an important guide to truth. After all, God endowed us with the ability to think and to use our minds in the service of science or the improvement of our world. But Lewis goes far beyond this. He seems to be following the tradition of the greatest philosopher of the Enlightenment, Immanuel Kant, who concluded that reason can conceive the existence of certain transcendental truths which are simply beyond reason's reach. Didn't Paul say more or less the same thing when he spoke of seeing through a glass darkly?