Author
Laura Smith

Sexist, dated, mere opinion

Right off the top, I am going to admit that Mere Christianity was a difficult read for me. Besides the war imagery to which I am (thankfully) not able to relate and the extensive use of "men" when discussing the entire human race, some of the discussions were ones I find hard to hear. Christianity has changed in the 53 years since C. S. Lewis wrote the book.

Guatemala damaged by Stan

Nine straight days of rains from Hurricane Stan saturated the porous volcanic soils within Guetamala in early October. The result was heavy flooding in the coastal areas where much of the commercial agriculture is concentrated. Rivers overflowed their banks, flooding the flat plains. In some places it created new pathways washing away homes, crops and livestock. The heavy rains were equally unmerciful in the highland areas where many native Mayan people live. The rains brought torrential amounts of mud and debris down mountainsides. Small streams and rivers overflowed and threatened entire communities in their path. Though many communities were evacuated, some did not receive any warning, particularly in Solola and San Marcos. These areas have now been declared mass graves.

God's loving purpose

As a happily married heterosexual woman without children, I am offended by the argument that marriage without children is not really marriage. Michael Coren (October) uses this argument to oppose same sex marriage. He writes, "Sex between people of the same gender can by its very nature never result in new life and is in the final analysis a selfish act. . . and never a means to that most glorious of ends, God-given life."

Dated, with pleasant surprises

Mere Christianity is remarkably autobiographical in detailing C.S. Lewis's own questions as he moved from atheism to Christianity. Questions he posed, insights he gained and understandings he reached are all shared. He does not assume his reader knows too much and so he deals with basic issues in a clear and concise way. This is one of the great strengths of the book, regardless of whether or not we agree with his particular interpretation of the issue at hand. At the same time this rational description and defence of the faith is being made from within a culture sympathetic to and supportive of Christianity, which, if not the religion of everyone, was still the religion that people were expected to have and one which received considerable support-such as BBC radio broadcasts.

Happy accidents

I read with interest Old Tosh and Balderdash by Andrew Faiz in October. While I agree with the content and argument presented, I believe he does a disservice to the authors of the books noted in the article. He implies The Eight by Katherine Neville, and The Rule of Four by Ian Caldwell and Dustin Thomason, were written in response to The Da Vinci Code. In fact, Ms. Neville's book was written in 1988, preceding the publication of Dan Brown's blockbuster by 15 years! The Rule of Four was published nearly a year after Da Vinci, but I would be very surprised if they had not written the greater part of their book before the 2003 publication date of The Da Vinci Code. I agree both are wonderful reads, but let's get our facts straight! They do not "try to distance themselves from Da Vinci." although perhaps sales of both books have increased as a result of the popularity of Da Vinci. A happy accident indeed, but definitely an accident. And that is my final contribution to keeping the story alive.

Langley, BC

First row: Chris Ouellet, Emma Carinie, Claire Davis, Steven Lennox, Cassie Ouellet, Claire Fowler; back row: Anneke Cairnie, visitor, Michelle Jeter-Krasnikoff; missing: teaching partner Josee […]